Shalom! My name is Adam Pastor

Welcome to ADONI MESSIAH which means
"My Lord Messiah" -
a fitting epithet to who Jesus (or Yeshua) is!

Here, I attempt to present the Apostolic Truths according to the Scriptures, that there is
One GOD, the Father, namely, YAHWEH,
and One Lord, GOD's only begotten Son,
Yeshua the Messiah.

And that one day YAHWEH will send His Son back to Earth to inaugurate the Everlasting Kingdom of GOD



Enjoy!


Thursday, May 17, 2007

Four 'ONE GOD' articles by Sean Finnegan

Whilst surfing the Net I came across a periodical called
Glad Tidings It deals with subjects such as
  1. The One God,
  2. Jesus Christ
  3. Kingdom Focus
  4. Christian Living; + other subjects.

What follows is a combination of four articles on the subject of The One God by Sean Finnegan.
I have added a few colors and amendments.
Enjoy!!  

(Scriptures taken from the New American Standard Bible unless otherwise noted)

Only The Father Is God
by Sean Finnegan

Jesus knew that this was his last time with the disciples before he would be taken into custody. He prayed just before he made his way across the Kidron Valley to the Garden of Gethsemane. The disciples listened earnestly; ... As he prayed he did not look down, instead he looked up to the Father. In the beginning of his prayer, he made an extraordinary statement about eternal life.

He said, "This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent." (John 17:3). According to this verse, there are two who must be known: the only true God, and Jesus Christ. Jesus considered the Father to be the only God and he considered himself to be distinct from that only God. This simple truth is elevated to the highest degree when he prefaced the statement with, "This is eternal life...." That is to say, eternal life depends on one’s understanding of God and His Son.

In addition, Paul the apostle was inspired by God to write along the same lines in his first letter to Timothy.

I Timothy 2:3-6 NASB
This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,
who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
For there is one God,
and one mediator also between God and men,
the man Christ Jesus,
who gave himself as a ransom for all,
the testimony
given at the proper time.

There are two closely linked desires of God listed:
1) for all to be saved, and
2) for all to come to know the truth.
In verse four "the truth" does not refer to all true things in general but a very specific truth. The next two verses explain "the truth" that God desires all men to know.

The first ingredient is that there is only one God. The second is that the man Christ Jesus is the one mediator between the one God and mankind. The third is that Jesus gave himself a ransom for all at the right time.

There is no confusion between Jesus and God; they are fully distinct in nature and in function. According to the greeting of this letter (I Timothy 1:2), God is the Father, and Jesus Christ is our Lord. Just a few verses earlier then where we are now, it says that the only God is immortal. (In the word "immortal," the prefix, im, means not; and mortal means can die; thus immortal means cannot die.) However, the third ingredient of "the truth" is that Jesus gave himself as a ransom for all. In order for Jesus to die, he must be mortal. Therefore, we conclude that the one God (the Father) is completely distinct from the one man (Christ Jesus). It is as important to recognize this distinction, as it is to understand that Christ gave himself as a ransom for all.

A third text that offers clarity on this issue can be found in I Corinthians. The context concerns idolatry and eating the foods that are sacrificed to idols. Paul recognizes that there are many who are called gods.

I Corinthians 8:6 NASB
Yet for us there is but one God, the Father,
from whom are all things and we
exist for Him;
and one Lord, Jesus Christ,
by whom are all things, and we exist through him.

This text leaves no wiggle room for complicated definitions of God. He is the Father Who created all things. He is the source from which everything, including Jesus, originated. He is the one God, and we are able to come to Him through the one Lord, Jesus Christ. The Father made everything, and we experience all things through Christ.

There are many other places in the New Testament that speak of God as the Father. Consider the following scriptures: John 1:18; 4:23 and 24; 6:27; 8:41 and 42, 54; 20:17; Romans 1:7; 15:6; I Corinthians 1:3; 8:6; 15:24; II Corinthians 1:2 and 3; 11:31; Galatians 1:1,3 and 4; Ephesians 1:2 and 3, 17; 4:6; 5:20; 6:23; Philippians 1:2; 2:11; 4:20; Colossians 1:2 and 3; 3:17; I Thessalonians 1:1, 3; 3:13; II Thessalonians 1:1 and 2; 2:16; I Timothy 1:2; II Timothy 1:2; Titus 1:4; Philemon 3; James 3:9; I Peter 1:2 and 3; II Peter 1:17; II John 1:3; Jude 1:1; Revelation 1:5 and 6.

The overwhelming weight of Scripture teaches that only the Father is God. He is the awesome Creator of everything in existence. He is the most powerful Being in the universe. He has no equal, as even Jesus confessed (John 10:29; 14:18). He is called the "one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all" (Ephesians 4:6 NASB). About two thousand years ago, He brought into existence His perfect Son who would save mankind from destruction. Jesus, the perfectly obedient one, followed God’s plan flawlessly. As a result today we have access to the Father through him.

Jesus Has A God
by Sean Finnegan

 Jesus is fully human. He was born (Luke 2:11), grew in wisdom (Luke 2:52), learned obedience (Hebrews 5:8), became tired (John 4:6), slept (Mark 4:38), had limited knowledge (Mark 5:30; 13:32), and died (Philippians 2:8). Jesus also prayed frequently (Matthew 14:23; Mark 14:32-39; Luke 6:12; John 11:41; 12:28; 17:1ff); he would go up to a mountain alone to spend time with his God. Jesus provides the supreme example of how we should live our lives because he is just like us. The only differences are that he was supernaturally begotten and he never sinned. However, there is much disagreement on this issue of who Jesus is today.

There are many verses in the Bible that make it clear that God is the Father of Jesus Christ.

Romans 15:6
So that with one accord you may with one voice
glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

II Corinthians 1:3
Blessed
be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Father of mercies and God of all comfort,

II Corinthians 11:31
The God and Father of the Lord Jesus,
He who is blessed forever, knows that I am not lying.

Ephesians 1:3,17
Blessed
be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing
in the heavenly
places in Christ,

That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Father of glory,
may give to you a spirit of wisdom
and of revelation in the knowledge of him.

Ephesians 3:14 (KJV)
For this cause I bow my knees
unto
the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,

Colossians 1:3
We give thanks to God,
the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
praying always for you,

I Peter 1:3
Blessed be
the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope
through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

II John 1:3
Grace, mercy
and peace will be with us,
from God the Father
and from
Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father,
in truth and love.

However, we will concentrate on the four places in Scripture in which Jesus used the words "my God."
Perhaps a brief survey of these four texts will provide insight into the relationship between Jesus and his God
(Mark 15:34; Matthew 27:46; John 20:17; Revelation 3:12).

The first two places are Mark 15:34 and Matthew 27:46. They will be considered together because they are two corresponding records of the same historical event – the crucifixion.

Mark 15:34
At the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice,
"ELOI, E L O I , L A M A SABACHTHANI?"
which is translated,
"
MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?"

Matthew 27:46
About the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying,
"ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI?" that is,
"
MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?"

Jesus is pictured crying out in agony while he hung in excruciating pain. Hospitals are like this today. A while back a friend of mine had his appendix removed. While we were waiting in the emergency room for the doctor, I experienced an eerie mixture of sounds. Some of the patients were snoring; several were crying out for God; and still others were muttering under their breath, "Lord, have mercy." Jesus was facing death, and he called out to his God, just as the rest of us would have done. He quoted the first line of a psalm that was well-known to him. Psalm 22 contains detailed prophecy about what he was experiencing during his crucifixion. When David wrote the psalm, he was going through some very difficult times; he felt that he was near death. He cried out to "my God." Yahweh is the God of David (Psalms 25:1 and 2). Jesus identified with this psalm of David. He called out to the same God (Yahweh) as David did.

The third place in which Jesus said "my God" is found in the Gospel of John.

John 20:17
Jesus said to her,
"Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father;
but go to my brethren and say to them,
'I ascend to My Father and your Father,
and
My God and your God.' "

In this brief interchange Jesus explained his view of God succinctly and matter of factly. If someone asked Jesus, "Who is God?" he would say, "My God and your God." It is just as simple as that. There is no need for complex definitions or paradoxes. Jesus had and still has a God – the Father.

The last text to consider is found in the book of Revelation. The letter to the church at Philadelphia concludes with the following statement.

Revelation 3:12
He who overcomes,
I will make him a pillar in the temple of
My God,
and he will not go out from it anymore;
and I will write on him the name of
My God,
and the name of the city of
My God,
the new Jerusalem,
which comes down out of heaven from
My God,
and my new name.

Four times over, the term "my God" is repeated by Jesus. Even in his resurrected and glorified position, he still recognizes that the Father is his personal God.
Though the Father has granted all authority in heaven and earth to him (Matthew 28:18), Jesus still keeps clear Who his God is.

If we are going to follow Jesus, then we should have the same God that he had. From the texts considered it is clear that he had only one God, the Father. Jesus never once prayed to or called the holy spirit his God. The Father never called the Son His God. Every time that Jesus used the words "my God," they were always in reference to the Father. Let us seek to follow Jesus in every area of our lives, especially when it comes to our relationship with God.


Jesus Died
by Sean Finnegan

Someone once asked the question: "Can God microwave a burrito so hot that He cannot eat it?" To answer yes implies that God cannot eat extremely hot burritos. To answer no implies that God cannot heat it to such a level. This sort of question is flawed because it consists of a contradiction. It is similar to saying, "Can God make a square circle?" The definition of "square" is that there are four right angles with equal sides, whereas the definition of "circle" is that there are no right angles and only one side. Thus, the question involves a contradiction of definition and is therefore meaningless. Sometimes we ask questions like this in the realm of theology. The reasoning usually starts with the assumption "God can do anything," and quickly progresses to "He could become man and die if He wanted to."

I believe that the statement, "God died," is just as meaningless as the burrito question.

It is my position that there are certain attributes that God cannot change. For example, God cannot lie, cheat, steal, covet, become weak, commit suicide, die, etc. This is because these sorts of qualities contradict God’s attributes by definition. So let us consider how the Bible defines God with respect to mortality and see what can be concluded.

Isaiah 57:15
For thus says the high and exalted One Who lives forever,
whose name is Holy, "I dwell on a high and holy place,
And also with the contrite and lowly of spirit
In order to revive the spirit of the lowly
And to revive the heart of the contrite.

Daniel 4:34
But at the end of that period, I, Nebuchadnezzar,
raised my eyes toward heaven
and my reason returned to me,
and I blessed the Most High and praised
and honored Him who lives forever;
For His dominion is an everlasting dominion,
And His kingdom endures from generation to generation.

I Timothy 1:17
Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible,
the only God,
be honor and glory forever and ever.
Amen.

I Timothy 6:15 and 16
... He who is the blessed and only Sovereign,
the King of kings and Lord of lords,
who alone possesses immortality
and dwells in unapproachable light,
whom no man has seen or can see.
To Him be honor and eternal dominion!
Amen.

(Also see Deuteronomy 32:40; Psalms 41:13; 102:12, 24-27; Isaiah 40:28; etc.)

God lives forever; He is immortal.
("Immortal" means cannot die.)

This is part of Who God is. If He died, then He would have to cease being God. There is just no way around it. In fact, death can be a test of deity. If someone claimed to be God, then he or she should also be immortal. If this person were shot with a gun, then he should not die. In fact, no matter what was done to him or her (including dropping a nuclear bomb on the head), such a person would continue to live–all because if someone claims to be God, he must be immortal. This does not mean that all immortal beings are God, but it does mean that if someone claims to be God, then he better be immortal.

I once discussed this apparent contradiction (how could Jesus be God if he died) with an assistant pastor in a local church. He told me that Jesus did not really die, just his body did. Jesus continued to live. His soul (mind/consciousness) left his body upon death. Thus, Jesus died but continued to live. This is certainly an interesting proposition. But, how would you test it to see if it were true or not? How do the Scriptures speak of the death of Christ? Are special words used that would imply that his soul migrated, ascended, or escaped? Consider the following verses.

Matthew 17:22 and 23
And while they were gathering together in Galilee,
Jesus said to them,
"The Son of Man is going to be
delivered into the hands of men;
and they will kill him,
and he will be raised on the third day."
And they were deeply grieved.

John 10:11
"I am the good shepherd;
the good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep."

John 18:32
to fulfill the word of Jesus which he spoke,
signifying by what kind of death he was about to die.

John 19:33
but coming to Jesus, when they saw that
he was already dead,
they did not break his legs.

Revelation 1:17 and 18
When I saw him, I fell at his feet like a dead man.
And he placed his right hand on me, saying,
"Do not be afraid; I am the first and the last,
and the living One;
and I was dead,
and behold, I am alive forevermore,
and I have the keys of death and of Hades."

(Also see Mark 9:31; Luke 9:22; John 15:13; 18:31; Acts 2:23 and 24; 3:15; 5:30; 7:52; I Corinthians 15:3; I Thessalonians 4:14; etc.)

No fancy or ethereal words are used. Jesus died; they killed him; he laid down his life (soul); he said of himself, "I was dead." Jesus died just like the millions of humans who preceded him. It is as simple as that. If "died" really meant "continued to live," then we are back to square circles–meaningless definitions.

The Bible teaches repeatedly that death is like sleep (Daniel 12:2; John 11:11-14; Ephesians 5:14). There is not any activity, planning, knowledge, or wisdom in death (Ecclesiastes 9:10). In fact, those who are dead do not think at all (Ecclesiastes 9:5). Death is like dreamless sleep–a cessation of consciousness. The only escape from death is resurrection (John 5:28 and 29; I Corinthians 15:21- 23; I Thessalonians 4:14-17).

If Jesus did not really die, then are our sins really [forgiven?] The Old Testament, which serves as our schoolmaster, may shed some light on what being a sacrifice for sin means.

Leviticus 4:14-16, 18 and 19
when the sin which they have committed becomes known,
then the assembly shall offer a bull of the herd
for a sin offering
and bring it before the tent of meeting.
Then the elders of the congregation shall lay their hands on the head of the bull before YAHWEH,
and the bull shall be slain before YAHWEH.
Then the anointed priest is to bring some of the blood of the bull to the tent of meeting;

...and all the blood he shall pour out at the base of the altar of burnt offering
which is at the doorway of the tent of meeting.
He shall remove all its fat from it and offer it up in smoke on the altar.

Could you wound, maim, or nearly kill the sacrificial animal for it to take effect? Absolutely not! The animal must die because, as Paul said, "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23). Someone had to die. Fortunately, God in His grace allowed animals to be substituted for the people who sinned. Yet, as the book of Hebrews explains in detail, the sacrifices of the Old Testament pointed to Christ and what he would do on behalf of mankind.

Hebrews 7:26 and 27
For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest [Jesus],
holy, innocent, undefiled,
separated from sinners and exalted above the heavens;
who does not need daily, like those high priests,
to offer up sacrifices, first for his own sins and then for the sins of the people,
because this he did once for all when he offered up himself.

Hebrews 9:24-26
For Christ did not enter a holy place made with hands,
a mere copy of the true one,
but into heaven itself,
now to appear in the presence of God for us;

nor was it that he would offer himself often,
as the high priest enters the holy place year by year with blood that is not his own.
Otherwise, he would have needed to suffer often
since the foundation of the world;
but now once at the consummation of the ages
he has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

In order for our sins to be [sacrificed] for, Jesus had to die (cease to live) as our substitute sacrifice just like the animals in the Old Testament. Jesus’ death makes possible our forgiveness, justification, reconciliation, and escape from the wrath to come.

Romans 5:6,8-10
For while we were still helpless,
at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.
But God demonstrates His own love toward us,
in that while we were yet sinners,
Christ died for us.
Much more then, having now been justified by his blood,
we shall be saved from the wrath of God through him.
For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son,
much more, having been reconciled,
we shall be saved by his life.

Colossians 1:21 and 22
And although you were formerly alienated
and hostile in mind,
engaged in evil deeds,
yet he has now reconciled you
in his fleshly body through death
,
in order to present you before him holy and blameless and beyond reproach

I Thessalonians 5:9 and 10
For God has not destined us for wrath,
but for obtaining salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,
who died for us,
so that whether we are awake or asleep,
we will live together with him.

Taking all of this into account, we can conclude the following:

1. God cannot die;
2. Jesus died;
3. If he did not really die, then our sins are not really [sacrificed] for;
----------------------------
Jesus is not God.

 

I do not think there is a way around this conclusion. If there is, then I would like to know.
( You can email me : sean@KingdomReady.org).
This seems to be the best way to understand Jesus’ death. If Jesus is not God, but God’s supreme representative commissioned to speak His words and perform His will, then how remarkable is it that he obeyed his whole life through to the death! He could have failed. He could have given in to temptation. Yet, he humbled himself to the disgrace of a criminal’s death on a cross.
And, having died, he remained asleep, totally unconscious of his three-day sojourn in utter darkness, until at once God Himself shattered the darkness by raising His beloved Son from death to life eternal.
It is a beautiful story, which I believe is cheapened when Jesus is thought to be God – one who would not have been able to fail, could not really be tempted, and did not really die.

Jesus Confirmed the
Shema

by Sean Finnegan sean@KingdomReady.org

Fact: All Jews believe that God is one.

The Jewish people use the Hebrew Scriptures (our Old Testament) as their chief source of religious information. In this set of sacred Scripture are dozens of statements concerning the exclusive nature of God. Consider a few of these below:

Exodus 20:2 and 3
"I am Yahweh
your God,
who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.
You shall have no other gods before Me."

Deuteronomy 4:35, 39
To you it was shown that you might know
that Yahweh, He is God; there is no other besides Him.
Know therefore today, and take it to your heart,
that Yahweh, He is God in heaven above
and on the earth below;
there is no other.

Isaiah 45:5 and 6
I am Yahweh, and there is no other;
Besides Me there is no God.

I will gird you, though you have not known Me;
That men may know from the rising to the setting of the sun
That there is no one besides Me.
I am Yahweh, and there is no other,

Jeremiah 10:10
But Yahweh is the true God;
He is the living God and the everlasting King.
At His wrath the earth quakes,
And the nations cannot endure His indignation.

One of the primary expressions of Jewish faith, recited twice daily in prayer, is called the Shema ["shema" is the Hebrew word meaning "hear" or "listen"]. This section of Scripture (see below) is called the Shema because that is its first word.

 Deuteronomy 6:4 and 5
Hear [Shema], O Israel!
Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one!
You shall love Yahweh your God
with all your heart and with all your soul
and with all your might.

At times, the children of Israel strayed from this bedrock creed of worshipping only Yahweh. When this happened, the prophets reproved the people with fiery words of judgment.

Judges 10:13 and 14
Yet you have forsaken Me and served other gods;
therefore I will no longer deliver you.
Go and cry out to the gods which you have chosen;
let them deliver you in the time of your distress.

Ezekiel 16:35-38
Therefore, O harlot, hear the word of Yahweh.
Thus says the Lord Yahweh,
"Because your lewdness was poured out
and your nakedness uncovered
through your harlotries with your lovers
and with all your detestable idols,
and because of the blood of your sons
which you gave to idols,
therefore, behold, I will gather all your lovers
with whom you took pleasure,
even all those whom you loved

and
all those whom you hated.
So I will gather them against you from every direction
and expose your nakedness to them
that they may see all your nakedness.
Thus I will judge you like women who commit adultery or shed blood are judged;
and I will bring on you the blood of wrath and jealousy."

Israel is repeatedly likened to a traitor, an adulterous wife who takes all that God gives her and then sneaks out to have relations with the other gods. The message is simple: return to Yahweh as your sole God, and you will be delivered; worship someone or something else, and you will be punished severely. Yahweh is jealous–He does not want His people to have any other gods (Deuteronomy 4:24; 5:9; 6:15; 32:16, 21).

Fact: Jesus is a Jew.

Mary was a Jew; Joseph was a Jew. Eight days after Jesus was born, he was circumcised (Luke 2:21) according to the Jewish rite handed down by Abraham. Then they offered the appropriate sacrifice (two turtledoves) for a firstborn son (Luke 2:24). Jesus was taught the Jewish Scriptures. He followed the Jewish law. He went to the temple in Jerusalem at 12 years of age (Luke 2:42). Later, he became a Jewish rabbi who traveled from town to town proclaiming that the God of the Jews was soon to intervene in the normal functioning of human affairs and establish the Kingdom of God on earth (a very Jewish concept often called by Jews today "the messianic age"). Jesus was known to be the Jewish Messiah who would reign on the throne of David (the Jewish ancestor who reigned over Israel). There is little doubt that Jesus was (and still is) a Jew.

He never once preached a sermon redefining the number of persons in the Godhead. He was completely consistent with the Jewish environment within which he operated. He had been told about the perils of forsaking Yahweh as the one true God of Israel. He had read the prophets and was intimately acquainted with the God about Whom they spoke.

Fact: Jesus explicitly confirmed
that God is one.

Although it is often supposed that through Jesus’ words and actions he opened people’s eyes to see his deity, what does the Scripture say? We are not left to guess if Jesus believed the same as the Jewish people, because he explicitly confirmed the Shema of Deuteronomy 6:4.

Mark 12:28-30
One of the scribes came and heard them arguing,
and recognizing that he had answered them well, asked him,
"What commandment is the foremost of all?"
Jesus answered,
"The foremost is,
'HEAR [Shema], O ISRAEL!
THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD;
AND YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD
WITH ALL YOUR HEART,
AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL,
AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND,
AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH.
' "

This statement leaves no wiggle room for additional persons in the Godhead. The LORD (Yahweh) our God is one, and He is the One deserving all our love. Yet, this is not an isolated incidence of confirmation.

John 17:3 This is eternal life,
that they may know You, the only true God,
and Jesus Christ whom You have sent.

Here, Jesus used different words to convey the same simple truth. Jesus prays to his Father (John 17:1) and makes a categorical statement: the Father is the only one who is truly God.

Conclusion: Followers of Jesus should believe God is one.

As followers of Jesus, we should adopt his beliefs as our beliefs. This is the chief task of a disciple (to imitate his master). Jesus never quoted (or even heard of) the Athanasian Creed, wherein it is stated that God is a trinity. I know that most modern Christians define God as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Nevertheless, what did Jesus say? Whom did Jesus worship? He worshipped the Jewish God as revealed in the Hebrew Scriptures. The New Testament never redefined God (although Jesus did amplify God's Fatherly role). Let us be like Jesus who proudly answered those who questioned him with a firm declaration of the Shema.

If the Shema is the creed of Jesus,
then perhaps it should be our creed as well.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Did Jesus claim to be God when arrested? By Mel Hershberger

Did Jesus claim to be God
when arrested?

By Mel Hershberger

Some claim that Jesus proclaimed that he was the “I AM” of Ex. 3 when he was arrested in the garden. Can we know what he meant? Can we know if the arresting guards believed that Jesus made such a claim? Let’s examine the scriptures.

Ex. 3:13-15—“Then Moses said to God, ‘Behold, I am going to the sons of Israel, and I will say to them, The God of your fathers has sent me to you’. Now they may say to me, ‘What is his name?’ What shall I say to them? God said to Moses, ‘I AM WHO I AM;’ and He said, Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’ God furthermore, said to Moses, ‘Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, The Lord, The God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and this is My memorial-name to all generations.” (NASB) The name given “YHWH Elohim”.

Strong’s # 1961 ‘I AM’ sounds like ‘haw-yaw’ in the Hebrew. It does not say that ‘I AM’ is God’s name, nor is it implied. Without question, the name is given as the same individual as Jesus’ Father in Acts 3:13. To illustrate, some one being sent out with a mission from an imaginary Pope might ask ‘Who shall I say sent me and what is your name?’ The region you’re sending me is not too familiar with you. “I am the Pope. Tell them the Pope has sent you. Make sure to emphasize that I want to be known by my name John Henry the 1st.” When you get a complete source of compilations of OT quotes in the NT, you find that Ex. 3:14 is not reference even once. It says in Ex. 4:28-31 that all the words that God had spoken to Moses were told to Aaron and the elders of Israel. God is never again referred to as I AM by Himself or by anyone else in the entire Bible.

Did Jesus claim he was God when he was arrested? Let’s examine the incident. “Judas then, having received the Roman cohort and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees, (it is vital to notice that officers from the priests and Pharisees were present) came there with lanterns and torches and weapons. So Jesus, knowing all things that were coming upon him, went forth and said to them, ‘Whom do you seek?’ They answered Him, ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’ He said to them, ‘I am He (the Greek words ego-eimi).’ And Judas also, who was betraying Him, was standing with them. So when he said to them, ‘I am He (ego-eimi).’ They drew back and fell to the ground. Therefore he asked them, ‘Whom do you seek?’ And they said, ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’ Jesus answered, ‘I told you that I am He (ego-eimi); so if you seek me, let these go their way,” John 18:3-8. (NASB). Jesus was simply acknowledging that he was the one they were looking for. He was just using proper “English” (or was it Greek), the language of the day just as we’ll see that others did. In fact, others used the very same expression. How would we allow Jesus to answer? I is? (Why did they fall back? And why did Jesus say ‘I am’? We’ll look at a few more scriptures first)

If “ego-eimi” means one is God, then how do we explain the following texts? The blind man whom Jesus healed answered “ego-eimi” when his identity was in doubt. “Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I am he (ego-eimi).”John 9:9. (KJV used for remaining texts). Was the healed man really saying that he was God? Can we accept that perhaps our teaching was wrong in the past?

Was the centurion God? This is what he said. “For I am (ego-eimi) a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.” Mat. 8:9. Dare we ask if we are just selective in which scriptures we accept, or is our (ego) still too alive?

We know how brash Peter could be in the gospels, but then we can see the great change that his attitude and life went through when reading his writings. After a dramatic encounter with “God” in a vision, Peter no doubt was quite humble as he visited with Cornelius. “Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am (ego-eimi) he whom ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come? Acts 10:21. Should we not also claim that Peter was identifying himself as Moses’ I AM?

Surely we wouldn’t accuse Jesus of being carnal. But scripture says “ego-eimi” can be carnal. Notice in Rom. 7:14. “For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am (ego-eimi) carnal, sold under sin.” Paul claimed he still was carnal, not the Old Testament God.

If there is still any doubt to the identity of “ego-eimi”, this should remove all doubt. 1 Tim. 1:15 says “This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am (ego-eimi) chief.” Imagine “ego-eimi” being the chief sinner. But that is what Paul claimed.

The trial of Jesus proves positively that Jesus was not stating that he was the God who visited Moses. “Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put him to death; But found none: (the arresting guards would have brought forth the blasphemy of Jesus having claimed to be God, but since they didn’t, demonstrates that they never believed that that was what Jesus had claimed) yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses, And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days. And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? What is it which these witness against thee? But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? Behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy. What think ye? They answered and said, He is guilty of death.” Mat. 26:59-66—(This proves that they knew Jesus did not imply that he was God. He was convicted on a milder statement. The reason he had to be interrogated was because he didn’t say anything remotely close to saying “he was Moses’ God”.

Perhaps here is a clue as to why the arresting guards fell backwards. Ps. 45:5. “Thine arrows are sharp in the heart of the king’s enemies; whereby the people fall under thee.” Apparently a prophecy the guards had to fulfill. In God’s Sovereignty, the guards did what God intended. A second reason could be that they were so surprised that Jesus would reveal that he was the one they were looking for instead of running. And in the darkness they were taken aback and fell over each other. Surely they grasped that their potential prisoner knew that he was putting himself in harms way, trying to protect his disciples, and were overwhelmed. The text clearly shows that that was one of Jesus’ motives. ...

Adopted from http://creatorgod.org/Did%20Jesus%20claim%20to%20be%20God%20when%20arrested.htm

The Kingdom of heaven

Here is an edited copy of a forum post concerning the Kingdom of Heaven which I mailed about a year ago:-

... Have another look at what the Scriptures speak of concerning the Kingdom of GOD and its Message/Gospel as preached by Jesus the Christ.
 

Quote:
I believe it is God's plan is to restore his kingdom government here on earth as he had in the past. The scripture in Daniel, which is prophecy concerning God's plan for our future. (Acts 1:6 )


I believe the above quote is scripturally correct.

The Gospel began with Abraham [Gal 3.8] and it is concerned with the Promised Seed [Gal 3.16] and the Promised Land
[Gen 12.1, 13.14-17, 15.7,8,18; 17.6-8, etc]
This is the basis of the Abrahamic Covenant.
However, the fact & dilemma is
'Abraham never ever did inherit the Land'.
More on that later.

The covenant was then expanded through David concerning his lineage.
[2 Sam 7.12-14, 1 Chr 17.11-14, 22.10, 28.5-7, Psa 89.36-37, etc]

(1 Chr 17:14) But I will settle him in mine house and in my kingdom for ever:
and his throne shall be established for evermore.

This Davidic Kingdom was GOD's Kingdom [2 Chr 9.8, 13.8], its headquarters being in the Promised Land, its capital city being Jerusalem, whereby GOD's viceregent ruled on the throne of David. [1 Chr 28.5-7]
This Kingdom was the Kingdom of YAHWEH on earth.
This is the basis of the Davidic covenant.

Sadly in the process of time, Israel fell repeatedly in sin, which resulted in Israel being thrown out of the Land, and the throne/viceregency vacated. [Ezek 21.27]

However, from that point onwards, GOD through the prophets, has always promised that He would restore the Kingdom, and that His chosen King, the Messiah, will one day be enthroned upon David's throne; upon which he will inaugurate worldwide peace, justice & righteousness.
[Ezek 21.27, Isa 9.7, Jer 23.5-6, 33.15-17, Luke 1.32-33, Psa 89.35-37, Isa 2.1-4, Micah 4.1-4, etc]

(Ezek 21:27) I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no more,
until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him.

GOD made some awesome Promises to Abraham, David & the Nation of Israel ... GOD keeps His promises ... Jesus came to confirm all these Promises. [Rom. 15.8]
GOD's Kingdom is all about
"Restoration Planet Earth, Restoration Promised Land, Restoration Jerusalem, Restoration 'the throne of David' "

Therefore, when Jesus came ... he came preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom of GOD ...
[Mark 1.14-15, Mat 4.17, 23; 9.35, 24.14, Luke 4.43, 8.1, 9.2,6]
(BTW the Kingdom of GOD and Kingdom of Heaven are identical and synonymous. Kingdom of Heaven is simply a Jewish circumlocution of the same term; used solely by Matthew) ...

Christ's audience already knew from the OT (i.e. the Hebrew Bible) what was meant by such a Kingdom. Jesus and his disciples were simply teaching and preaching the requirements needed for one to enter the coming Kingdom.

Hence, when Jesus was near geographical Jerusalem, his disciples assumed that the Kingdom was to "now" appear; thus, the Messiah gave the parable about the nobleman [Christ] going to a far country [Heaven] to return with a kingdom. It is at his return with the kingdom, that the nobleman rewards his faithful servants with rulership over cities.
[Luke 19:11ff, cp. Rev 2.26-7]

The disciples' concept of the Kingdom and its appearing wasn't wrong ... just the timing was wrong ... it wasn't yet to be. Christ had to go away first, in order to return.

Again after Christ's resurrection, after a 40-day seminar on the things concerning the Kingdom of GOD [Acts 1.3], the disciples asked (Acts 1:6) When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
Jesus answered: (Acts 1:7) And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

Again, there was nothing wrong with their question, neither was there anything wrong with their concept of the Kingdom (how could there be after being taught by the Messiah himself, the King de jure of the coming Kingdom).
They understood the concept that the Kingdom of GOD was to be restored to Israel.
It was just that the timing was not now ... it was yet be ... namely at the Return/Parousia of Christ. And they were not to know when that time would be!


Therefore, when Christ returns, he will raise the faithful dead, and reward them with immortality, and rulership in the worldwide Kingdom of GOD, its headquarters will be in the Promised Land, its capital city being Jerusalem. From hence, GOD's Kingdom will be worldwide. The world will be filled with the righteousness and peace of GOD.
[Isa 11.9]


How about Abraham? He never ever did inherit the land!! As Stephen said, (Acts 7:5) And he gave him none inheritance in it, no, not so much as to set his foot on: yet he promised that he would give it to him for a possession, and to his seed after him, when as yet he had no child.

How then shall Abraham, Isaac & Jacob, inherit the Promised Land?? ... since ...
(Heb 11:13) These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth.
(Heb 11:39-40) And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise: 40 God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.

None of them receive their promised inheritance, none of them received the promises.
How shall this be resolved? Answer: At the return of Christ, when he resurrects the saints, when Christ is enthroned upon the throne of his glory in Jerusalem; it is then that the saints including Abraham, Isaac & Jacob, shall receive their inheritance.
Truly, Abraham will be heir of the world. [Rom 4.13] Truly, the meek shall inherit the earth. [Matt 5.5]. Truly, the saints shall judge/administer/govern the world. [1 Cor 6.2]

(Mat 8:11) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.
(Luke 13:28 ) ... shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God ...
(Mat 19:28 ) And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
(Mat 25:31) When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
(Rev 5:9-10) And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; 10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth

Through the Coming/Parousia of Christ with the Kingdom of GOD, all the Promises spoken of in the OT (as well as the NT) shall be literally fulfilled!!!

Quote:
Jesus said His kingdom is not of this world


Christ was saying that his Kingdom was not of i.e. from/ek this world.
The Kingdom is not from this world ... it is from GOD. GOD will set it up. It is GOD's Kingdom.
A Kingdom of/from/ek Almighty GOD.

Again, look at Daniel.
(Dan 2:34-35) Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. 35 Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth.
(Dan 2:44) And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

GOD's Kingdom, the stone cut out without hands, will fill the whole earth.

(Dan 7:27) And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

GOD's coming Kingdom will be a Kingdom under the whole heaven.
Because this Kingdom will come to the earth from Heaven/GOD at the Coming of Christ, it is therefore called ...
'The Kingdom of Heaven' or 'The Kingdom of GOD'

The Kingdom of Heaven is a Kingdom of Heaven, of GOD,
i.e. a Kingdom from GOD ...
The Coming Kingdom will be a Kingdom of/from Heaven,
not a Kingdom in Heaven!!

Abraham [Heb 11.9-10,16], Isaac [Gen 28.4, Gal 3.14], Jacob
[Gen 35.10-12, 48.4], Daniel, all the Patriarchs, etc., never ever for one moment imagined that their future Hope, the fulfillment of GOD's promises would be a Land/Kingdom/City in Heaven or any other place removed from this planet. No! They all had the faith of Abraham [Rom 4.12,16] and looked forward to this planet being restored, renovated and reborn.
Hence Joseph's desire for his remains [Gen 50.25] to be placed in the Promised Land. He shared the same Hope:
Being resurrected in the Promised Land, the land of GOD's Kingdom, located on this planet. Again, read Matt 8.11.

Quote:
Jesus also said this present heaven and earth will pass away.

Indeed this present heaven & earth will pass away and give way to new heavens & earth that will be ushered in at the Coming of Christ and the inauguration of GOD's Kingdom.
How will it pass away? This present world will be renewed/restored/reborn in the Age to Come, the New age/epoch that will commence at Christ's coming.

(Mat 19:28 ) And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
(Acts 3:20-21) And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 21 Whom the heaven must receive [retain] until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.

This world, this planet, this system of things, will be recreated, renewed, restored, regenerated, reborn! That is why Isa 65.17ff describes a wonderful earthly paradise, speaking of Jerusalem, longevity, lushness, abundance; and carnivorous and venomous animals being vegetarian and at peace [cp. Isa 11.6-9].

This is a picture of the future Paradise, as it was, in the Garden of Eden.
This Planet Restored


Quote:
this present heaven and earth will be burned up on the hour and day of Jesus Christ return. - Jesus return is compared to the day of the flood with Noah (2 Peter 3:5-6)

Look again ...

(2 Pet 3:5-7) For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

The scriptures says that the heaven & earth of Noah's time perished! Amen! So it did. Every living thing perished. There was a mass depopulation. Only 8 humans and an ark full of animals survived.
However, was the planet itself destroyed. No! Was planet earth removed. No!
It was the same planet that was under judgment, the same planet overflowed with water, ... it was the same planet that had perished, that Noah, his family and the animals disembarked on to!

Remember, (2 Pet 3:6) Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished.
In like manner, at the coming of Christ, whereby Christ will
(2 Th 1:8 ) In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know
not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ;
this planet, this world will indeed perish, indeed pass away, indeed there will be a terrible judgment, indeed there will mass depopulation
[see Isa 24.1-23].

However, the same GOD that was able to preserve Noah and his family whilst the antediluvian world perished, is the same GOD who will preserve the immortalized, glorified saints, whilst fiery judgment is being meted out on this present heaven and earth at the end of this present evil age [Gal 4.4].
Nevertheless, after the fire, after the judgment, this planet will be renewed & reborn, it will be made fit to be ruled and administered over.
The saints will inherit the earth ... alongside Abraham, they will be heirs of the world, then they will reign with Christ over the world.


Quote:
rather they preach and teach of world peace or some type of paradise here on this present earth.


The Gospel of the Kingdom of GOD, as preached by Christ & his disciples, is about future world peace [Isa 2.4, 9.7, Micah 4.3], the future paradise [Lk 23.42-43], that will come upon this planet in the Age To Come.
It will be this earth, restored and renewed ... in such away that this present i.e. the former world, will not be remembered. [Isa 65.17] It will be such a transformation.
So, not only will the saints be transformed/changed [1 Cor 15.51-52] ... this planet also is looking forward to its transformation, its change; hence, it groans for the manifestation of the sons of GOD [Rom 8.19-23], which will not happen until the return of Christ.


I hope this post clarifies things and helps correct some erroneous assumptions about the Coming Kingdom of GOD.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Defining the Gospel

Defining the Gospel

This article is based upon:
http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/96.htm#3

Some editing has been done and all scripture quotations are taken from the New American Standard Bible unless otherwise stated.
Enjoy!

 

It is a puzzling fact that many who read the Bible abandon the simple rules of interpretation which they successfully apply to all other documents. They seem to forget the basic laws of communication which govern all written and spoken material. One of the most fundamental of these laws, which under normal circumstances we all apply unconsciously, is the “law of synonymous terms.” A narrative which introduces the word “automobile” may continue to refer to the same subject under varied terms. When the word “car” appears, or even “vehicle” or perhaps even “jalopy,” readers are not confused. They understand that these are words to describe the same thing. A synonymous expression may be simply an abbreviation. “The United States of America” may appear as “the United States,” “the States,” “the U.S.” or “America.” No one is disturbed by such use of alternative terms for the same thing. A letter which introduced its subject as “the wedding of Tom and Jenny” will later refer to the same event as “the wedding.” These are just plain, easy facts about all communication. If I say, “Tomorrow is my birthday, and when we go on our picnic...” you have no difficulty in seeing that the picnic is a birthday outing.

When it comes to the Bible, however, many forget these primary laws of language. An amazing miracle of misunderstanding occurs, affecting the heart of the Christian faith. Readers of Scripture seem unable to make the connection between different expressions for the same object. This failure to connect synonymous terms causes them to lose track of vital, revealing information about the Gospel itself. Let us illustrate our point.

The Primary Definitions of the Gospel

In Matthew 13:19, the Gospel Message brought by Jesus is defined as “the word of the Kingdom,” i.e., “the Kingdom of God,” since that is the full title of the Gospel as Matthew had earlier told us in 4:17 (Note: 'Kingdom of Heaven' and Kingdom of God' mean the very same thing!). In the very next verses (Matt. 13:20-23) this “the word of the Kingdom” is abbreviated to “the word.” (i.e. “the message.”) This happens five times in the four following verses. The original phrase “word of the Kingdom” is shortened to simply “the word” (or “the message.”) But we are expected to make the connection correctly. It would be very foolish to deny that “the word of the Kingdom” of Matthew 13:19 is something different when it is described as “the word” in the next four verses.
Clearly “the word” is “the word about the Kingdom.”

This simple piece of information has a dramatic effect on how we read the rest of the New Testament. The same Gospel Message appears under different “labels,” all of which, however, should be referred back to the basic definition of the Gospel provided by Jesus himself. When these interlocking connections are disregarded, the Gospel easily becomes detached from Jesus, the author (as God’s representative) of the Gospel Message. Detachment of the Gospel from Jesus’ own preaching is a theological disaster everywhere evident in contemporary invitations to salvation.

Here again is Jesus’ description of the Gospel Message, recorded by Matthew. We have no difficulty equating “the word of the Kingdom” with “the word.” The word is simply a “shorthand” version of “the word about the Kingdom”:

“When anyone hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what has been sown in his heart. This is the one on whom seed was sown beside the road. 20 The one on whom seed was sown on the rocky places, this is the man who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy; 21 yet he has no firm root in himself, but is only temporary, and when affliction or persecution arises because of the word, immediately he falls away. 22 And the one on whom seed was sown among the thorns, this is the man who hears the word, and the worry of the world and the deceitfulness of wealth choke the word, and it becomes unfruitful. 23 And the one on whom seed was sown on the good soil, this is the man who hears the word and understands it; who indeed bears fruit and brings forth, some a hundredfold, some sixty, and some thirty” (Matt. 13:19-23).

When Luke records the same parable he employs exactly the same “shorthand” technique. In Luke 8:11 “the seed [sown by the sower] is the word of God,” but in verses 12, 13, 15 it appears as “the word.” No one, however, would argue that it was no longer “the word of God.” Nor should we forget what Matthew taught us: that it is “the word/message about the Kingdom of God.”

If we extend our examination of Gospel synonyms over a wider span, we shall find that the law of equivalent phrases works to clarify and expand our understanding. Thus Matthew’s “word of the Kingdom” (Matt. 13:19) reappears in a later chapter as “the Gospel of the Kingdom” which is to be “preached in the whole world” (Matt. 24:14). This variant expression allows us immediately to make another connection. “The Gospel of the Kingdom” is the same exactly as “the word of the Kingdom.” But both expressions often appear, in the gospels as well as the rest of the New Testament, abbreviated as simply “the word” or “the Gospel.”

The Christian Message may alternatively be called the “Gospel of God.” This expression tells us something vitally important about the origin of the Gospel. It comes from God and so it is a divine word. Mark introduces the Gospel as the “the Gospel of God” (Mark 1:14) and in the next breath he defines what he means. It is “the Gospel about the Kingdom.” We make the obvious connection as we read Mark 1:14, 15: “... Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the Gospel of God, and saying, ‘The time is fulfilled, and the Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the Gospel.’” What Gospel? The Gospel of God. And what is that Gospel about? It is “the Gospel about the Kingdom of God.”

We have already discovered the same truth in Matthew’s account. Further confirmation about the content of the Gospel appears earlier in Matthew. He reported Jesus’ ministry in these words: “Jesus was going throughout all Galilee teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the Gospel of the Kingdom” (Matt. 4:23; 9:35).

Jesus and the Gospel writers, being excellent teachers and wanting to be sure that we do not fail to grasp the saving Message, keep telling us what the Gospel is. They carefully introduce us to the basic Christian vocabulary, just as we introduce children to the words they need to use as the basic tools of communication. Matthew says that Jesus went about “proclaiming/preaching the Gospel about the Kingdom.” Mark summarizes the content of Jesus’ preaching about the Kingdom as the “the Gospel of God” (Mark 1:14, 15). In his version of the parable we examined above, Mark later abbreviates “the Gospel of the Kingdom” and calls it, like Luke, “the word” (Mark 2:2; 4:14-20, 33). Matthew, as we saw, gives the same “shorthand” expression, calling the Gospel “the word.” In this way the narratives of the life of Jesus set up a network of interconnected synonyms, equivalent phrases all pointing to the same central idea —
the Gospel concerning the Kingdom of God.

The three accounts of Jesus’ parable of the sower furnish us with an indispensable key to understanding the Christian faith. What Matthew calls “the word of the Kingdom” (Matt. 13:19), Luke calls “the word of God” (Luke 8:11) and Mark simply “the word” (Mark 4:14). These are interchangeable names for the one saving Gospel — the Gospel about the Kingdom of God, the Christian Gospel.
“Word” (“message”) and “Gospel” are synonymous terms, giving “the Word/Message about the Kingdom,” “the Gospel about the Kingdom, “the Word of God, “the Gospel of God,” “the Word/Message” and “the Gospel.”

Throughout the accounts of Jesus’ ministry we find confirmation of the “law of synonymous expression.” Thus, for example, Matthew reports Jesus as saying: “This Gospel of the Kingdom of God shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony (or witness)” (Matt. 24:14). Mark records the same saying by writing that “the Gospel must first be preached” (Mark 13:10). Later Matthew refers to the Gospel as simply “this Gospel” (Matt. 26:13) and Mark writes “the Gospel” (Mark 14:9).

Our study reveals that the Christian Gospel has a name: It is the Gospel (or Message) about the Kingdom of God, known alternatively as God’s Gospel or simply the Gospel (or Message).

A major confusion arises in the minds of Bible readers when they encounter yet another name for the Gospel:
The Gospel of Christ.”
Does this mean the Gospel preached by Christ or the Message preached about Christ? Many instinctively opt for the second alternative only, forgetting that the Gospel of the Kingdom, Christ’s Gospel, is the foundation of all biblical preaching (Heb. 2:3). A major error of interpretation occurs when the primary definition of the Gospel from the lips of Jesus is forgotten. When the proper connections are made, however, there can be no doubt what the Gospel of Christ is: It is “the Word/Message/Gospel about the Kingdom of God (Matt. 13:19; 4:23; 9:35; 24:14), the Word/Message preached by Christ. This is not to deny that the Gospel is also about Christ — his death and his resurrection. However, the foundation of the Gospel was laid by Jesus in his preaching about the Kingdom, long before he said a word about his death and resurrection.

Christ’s Gospel, according to the documents describing his ministry, was the Gospel about the Kingdom, which is also God’s Gospel/Message. God is the originator of the Gospel Message (the Gospel of God); Christ is the one who preached it (the Gospel of Christ). The subject matter of the Gospel is the Kingdom of God (the Gospel of the Kingdom).
These phrases may be compressed as “the Gospel,” but we must never forget its full title as:
God’s and Christ’s Gospel Message about the Kingdom of God.

Every time “the word” is preached or received in the book of Acts, it is essential that we remind ourselves of the content of that Word/Message. Otherwise we are in danger of failing to connect synonymous phrases and precious information is thrown away. Luke is careful to maintain in the book of Acts the same basic gospel terminology he established in his first book (the gospel of Luke). Thus in Acts 6:4, the Apostles devote themselves “to prayer and the ministry of the word.” “Those who had been scattered went about preaching the word” (8:4), which is exactly the same as “preaching Christ” (8:5). What was involved in this activity? The answer appears in Acts 8:12: “When they believed Philip preaching the Good News [Gospel] about the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike.” Luke then reports that those who so believed had “received the word of God” (Acts 8:14). What word?
The Word/Message about the Kingdom of God and the Name of Jesus.

The pattern of preaching is exactly what we saw demonstrated by Jesus’ own ministry as preacher of the Kingdom. Jesus, in fact, after his resurrection, continued the proclamation of ‘the Kingdom of God’ Gospel through his Apostles. The new facts about his death and resurrection were incorporated into the Gospel of the Kingdom. This confirmed the hope that the Kingdom of God would eventually appear.

Let us summarize what we have found so far. The Gospel which Jesus preached for our salvation is the Gospel about the Kingdom of God. Jesus stated that the entire reason why God commissioned him was to preach the Kingdom: “I must preach the Kingdom of God to the other cities also; for I was sent for this purpose.” (Luke 4:43). In the very next verse (Luke 5:1) we learn that people crowded round Jesus to hear “the word (message) of God.” The following equations are crystal clear:

The Gospel about the Kingdom of God = the Gospel of God = the Word/Message of the Kingdom = the Word/Message of God = the Word/Message.

Paul’s Gospel

In Paul’s letters the vocabulary is the same. In his earliest writing Paul represents his converts as “imitators of us and of the Lord” because they had “received the word” (1 Thess. 1:6); that “God was calling them into His own Kingdom” (1 Thess. 2:12). He urged his converts to be “worthy of the Kingdom of God” (2 Thess. 1:5). Paul never deviated from his practice of presenting the Word/Message about the Kingdom. Nearing his death, he urged Timothy to continue to “preach the word” (2 Tim. 4:2) in view of “Jesus’ appearing and Kingdom” (v. 1). Once again the Word/Message and the Kingdom are inseparably linked. Paul has faithfully preached the same Gospel as Jesus.

Across the pages of the New Testament one word unites Jesus’ and the Apostles’ preaching: It is the Word/Message/Gospel about the Kingdom of God. This is the “Gospel of God.” As we have seen, Jesus opened his ministry with this Message (Mark 1:14, 15). “The Gospel of God” is the name of the Message proclaimed also by Paul (Rom. 1:1; 15:16, 2 Cor. 11:7; 1 Thess. 2:2, 8, 9) and equally by Peter (1 Pet. 4:17). The same Word/Message came from the lips of Jesus (Luke 8:11) and later from the Apostles: “they spoke the word of God with boldness” (Acts 4:31).

Other synonymous terms describe the same Gospel Message is “the word of hearing” (1 Thess. 2:13; Heb. 4:2), emphasizing the method of communication by which the Gospel was spread and the critical need for us to hear and understand. It is “the word of (the) truth” (2 Tim. 2:15). In Ephesians 1:13 the saving Message is called “the message/word of (the) truth, the Gospel of your salvation,” because of its ability to dispel all the lying, counterfeit gospels of the Devil. The same Message is “the word of life” (Phil. 2:16) because by receiving it we may gain life and immortality from God in the coming Kingdom. “Life” is itself a synonym for the Kingdom of God (Matt. 19:17, 23; Rom. 5:17).

It is “the message/word of this salvation” (Acts 13:26), because it alone is able to rescue us from death. And it is also “the word of reconciliation” (2 Cor. 5:19) because it brings about a reconciliation between God and man. It is the “Gospel of grace” (Acts 20:24) because God’s plan to set up the Kingdom (v. 25) is His gracious act in favor of those who obey Him. Finally it includes “the word of the cross” (1 Cor. 1:18) because the death of Jesus for mankind ratifies the New Contract (Covenant) and makes possible his future establishment of the Kingdom. The fundamental content of this Message/Word is “the Good News about the Kingdom” (Mark 1:14, 15; Luke 4:43; 8:1; 9:2, 11, 60; Matt. 3:2; 4:17, 23; 9:35; 24:14; Acts 8:12; 19:8; 20:25; 28:23, 31). This is Christ’s own Gospel, the Gospel of Christ, the special revelation of grace (Acts 20:24) granted by God who declares His purpose to establish the Kingdom of God on earth. As Paul preached the Gospel of grace (Acts 20:24) he was preaching/proclaiming the Kingdom (v. 25). There is no difference whatever between the Gospel of grace and the proclamation of the Kingdom (Acts 20:24, 25). In the book of Revelation the Gospel is called “the Gospel of the coming age,” mistranslated in our versions as “the eternal Gospel” (Rev. 14:6).

A moment’s reflection reveals that the Bible’s constant name for the Gospel is “the Gospel about the Kingdom.” All the other synonymous titles for the Gospel should be referred back to the “parent texts” in Mark 1:14, 15, Matthew 4:23 and Luke 4:43, the key to the definition of God’s saving Message.

“... Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the Gospel of God, and saying, ‘The time is fulfilled, and the Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the Gospel.’” (Mark 1:14, 15).

“Jesus was going throughout all Galilee teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the Gospel of the Kingdom (Matt. 4:23; 9:35).

“I must preach the Kingdom of God to the other cities also; for I was sent for this purpose.” (Luke 4:43).

There is an urgent need for the biblical label for the Gospel to be taught everywhere since the “Gospel of the Kingdom,” amazingly, is a phrase seldom, if ever, now heard on the lips of modern evangelists. In this they betray their departure from the preaching of Jesus. The absence of the phrase “Gospel about the Kingdom” is all the more alarming since Jesus’ first command to the potential convert was “Repent and believe in the Gospel about the Kingdom of God” (see Mark 1:14, 15). That’s where Christian conversion, rebirth and discipleship begin.

New Testament Christianity is based on Christ’s teaching.

This is a simple fact frequently overlooked. John considered this lesson one of the most important to be driven home to his disciples. He warned that “Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; ...” (2 John 9). Christ’s teaching is summarized under the heading the Gospel Message about the Kingdom of God (Matt. 13:19; Mark 1:14, 15; Luke 4:43, etc.). It is that Message which, according to Jesus, must take firm root as the seed of immortality sown in the heart of the believer. The devil understands this (perhaps better than many contemporary preachers).

Luke’s warning is clear: Whenever anyone hears the word [about the Kingdom, Matt. 13:19], the devil comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart, so that he may not believe and be saved (see Luke 8:12).

In Christianity salvation depends on hearing, understanding and acting upon the Gospel about the Kingdom of God — hearing, believing and obeying it. Christians according to Jesus’ definition are “disciples of the Kingdom” (Matt. 13:52) and “sons (children) of the Kingdom” (Matt. 13:38). ...

Once they have understood the Kingdom, Christians are meant to pass on the Gospel about the Kingdom to others far and wide (see the urgency of the task in Luke 9:60). They are committed to following the Church’s “marching orders” to go into the whole world and preach and teach everything Jesus taught, summarized as the Gospel of the Kingdom. The practice of Jesus and Paul is identical when it comes to their evangelistic activity:

“... welcoming them, he [Jesus] began speaking to them about the Kingdom of God ...” (Luke 9:11).

“And he [Paul] stayed two full years ... and was welcoming all who came to him, preaching the Kingdom of God and teaching concerning the Lord Jesus Christ ...” (Acts 28:30, 31).

How well are you complying with Jesus’ orders?

...

Monday, February 26, 2007

Concerning 'another deity' and the 'word' - PART 3 & Appendix

CONCLUSION
 
Hopefully, I have established two points i.e.
  1. That the Hebrew Scriptures simply do not allow the possibility for another deity, whether co-equal or subordinate.
    GOD knew of no other deity neither was He going to form one.
    The Jews knew of and honored solely one GOD, one deity, who was the Creator of all things, namely, YAHWEH.


  2. That John's prologue was written with a style and idiom which was in line with earlier Jewish writings of that era.
    That is, GOD's actions, GOD's wisdom, GOD's word; were personified, depicted as male & female figures, to describe the ONE GOD's actions in His creation. These personifications were never meant to be taken literally; neither did the readers of that time take them literally. Both 1st-century Jews & Christians understood John's prologue as describing GOD's word - that through GOD's active word all things were created; GOD's word was sent into the creation.
    The new thing which was totally unknown in earlier writings which John was declaring, is that GOD's word literally became a person - the personification became a person resulting in the conception of Jesus of Nazareth, the logos of GOD made flesh! Jesus is what the logos became ... a man, a human being!
Thus, the Scriptures collectively, both OT & NT, the Bible ... is indeed a unitarian book - not trinitarian, not binitarian; but a unitarian book.
It depicts
solely one deity, one GOD who has made
one human being, His Son, Lord and Messiah.
So you have ONE GOD who has ONE right hand man!

[Psa 80.17, 110.1]
And this man operates in the power of his GOD.
[Micah 5.2-4]

There is no room for 2 or 3 Gods - no room for another deity.

The theology has not changed. The Jews still have solely ONE GOD.
The difference being that in the NT, the Messiah has been revealed, namely, the man Christ Jesus.
Besides, all Scripture-believing Jews recognized from the Scriptures that the Messiah was meant to be a man of the lineage of David. They never ever for one moment believed that the Messiah would be (an incarnation of) their GOD or a deity of some sort; No! They knew from the Scriptures that the Messiah would be a human being. Although, a human being greatly endowed by the power of GOD [e.g. Isa 11.2, etc], however nonetheless a human being.
 
Sadly, although Israel as a nation have rejected Jesus of Nazareth as that Messiah; it wasn't because he turned out to be some deity/demigod made flesh! No! He indeed is a man of the seed of David. Yes! Supernaturally conceived. Nonetheless a human being. I believe Israel as a whole rejected him because they expected him to inaugurate GOD's Kingdom at his arrival; and therefore, no way did they believe for one moment that their Messiah would die much less be crucified!
[cp. Mt 16.21-22, Mark 8.31-32, 9.31-32, Luke 18.31-34]

That was their main hurdle ...
how could their long-awaited Lord Messiah be that man from Nazareth who was crucified like a common criminal, who did not usher in GOD's Kingdom!!
Thus the Apostles labored to show from the Hebrew Scriptures that the Messiah was indeed prophesied to suffer & die first, spend some indeterminate time in Heaven at GOD's right hand; and at his return/Parousia, he would then inaugurate GOD's Kingdom upon the earth.
 
Because Israel as a whole rejected Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah; in the following century, many Gentile believers with a Hellenistic background studied the Scriptures with great ignorance of the Jewish styles and idioms used in their writings. (Their writings includes the Bible which is a Hebrew Book.)
Because of Israel's rejection of Christianity plus other various reasons, there was just not enough Hebrew input to correct this Gentile input of foreign ideas/concepts.
Hence, the Scriptures & Jewish idioms were being misinterpreted. Especially, the opening of the Gospel of John was misinterpreted ... which gave rise to Gnostic concepts, intermediary figures, demiurges, demigods & eventually the Jewish Messiah was made into a deity!
 
However, once one returns to the Hebrew Scriptures with a Hebrew mindset; by the Grace of GOD one will discover the truth of the ONE GOD and the One Lord, His Son ...
the ONE GOD and His right hand man!
 
Dear Readers, may GOD continue to aid and direct you as you seek these truths.
May He Bless your every endeavor.
 
APPENDIX

  1. Some applicable quotes related to the subject at hand:

    • As a leading scholar at Cambridge recently wrote, "John is as undeviating a witness as any in the New Testament to the fundamental tenet of Judaism, of unitary monotheism"
      (cp. Rom. 3:30; James 2:19).

      There is one true and only God (John 5:44; 17:3). Everything else is idols (1 John 5:20) ...
      Jesus refuses the claim to be God (John 10:33). 
      (J.A.T. Robinson, 12 More NT Studies, p. 175).

    • At Qumran (the Dead Sea Scrolls), Jews wrote, "By God's knowledge everything has been brought into being. And everything that is God established by His purpose, and apart from Him nothing is done" (1 QS XI.11).
    • "In the beginning was the purpose, the purpose in the mind of God, the purpose which was God's own being this purpose took human form in Jesus of Nazareth"
      (G.B. Caird, New Testament Theology, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, p. 332).

  2. For more info, on the expression, the word was with GOD, read II. THE WORD IN JOHN 1:1 in this article: What's in a Word? Recovering the Vocabulary of the New Testament  

  3. For more info on the opening verses of John 1:1, I recommend John 1:1 Caveat Lector (Reader Beware)

  4. Here are some other examples of John 1:3-4 being translated using IT
    • Tomson, Lawrence. The New Testament of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Translated out of Greeke by Theod. Beza.
      London: Robert Barker, 1607.

      In the beginning was that Word, and that Word was with God, and that Word was God. This same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it, and without it was made nothing that was made. In it was life, and that life was the light of men. And that light shineth in the darknes, and the darknesse comprehended it not.

    • Mortimer, Mr. Divers Parts of the Holy Scriptures Done into English.
      London: T. Piety, 1761.

      The word was
      in the beginning; and the word was with God, and the word was God; [the word] was with God in the beginning]. Through the same all things were made, and without the same was not made even one thing that was made. In the same was life, and that life was the light of human beings; and the light shineth on the darkness, yet the darkness apprehended it not.

    • Wakefield, Gilbert. A Translation of the New Testament.
      London: Philanthropic Press, 1791.

      In the beginning was Wisdom, and Wisdom was with God, and Wisdom was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it, and without it was nothing made. What was made, had life in it, and this life was the light of men; and this light shineth in darkness, and the darkness hindered it not.

    • Campbell, Alexander. The Sacred Writings of the Apostles and Evangelists of Jesus Christ, Commonly Styled the New Testament, Translated from the Original Greek.
      Buffaloe, Brooke County, VA: Alexander Campbell, 1826.

      In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it, and without it not a single creature was made. In it was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shone in darkness; but the darkness admitted it not.

    • Dickinson, Rodolphus.  A New and Corrected Version of the New Testament; or, a Minute Revision, and Professed Translation of the Original Histories, Memoirs, Letters, Prophecies, and Other Productions of the Evangelists and Apostles.
      Boston: Lilly, Wait, Colman and Holden, 1833.

      In the beginning existed the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This was in the commencement with God. All things were formed by it, and without it not even one thing was made, which has existed. In it was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shone in darkness, and the darkness did not overpower it.

    • Barnard, David.  The Holy Bible; Being the English Version of the Old and New Testaments, Made by Order of King James I, Carefully Revised and Amended, by Several Biblical Scholars.
      Mannsville, NY: D. S. Dean and Rhodes Barker, 1847.

      In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it; and without it nothing was made that was made. In it was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shone in the darkness; and the darkness did not admit it.

    • Folsom, Nathaniel S. The Four Gospels: Translated from the Greek Text of Tischendorf. 
      Boston: A. Williams, 1869.

      In [the] beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word. This was in [the] beginning with God. All things through it arose into being, and without it arose not even one thing which has arisen. In it is Life, and the Life was the Light of men. And the Light shines on, in the Darkness; and the Darkness did not apprehend it.


  5. Concerning (John 1:15) John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before [Gk. protos ] me.

    Before [protos] is being used in the sense of pre-eminence & priority, not time! John was indeed older than Jesus, however Jesus being the Lord Messiah, the Son of GOD, was John's superior.
    Once again it is an issue of translation. The Greek may equally read "because he is first [Greek protos] in regard to me," (as stated in the margin of the 1885 English Revised Version of the Bible), meaning,

    "he is better than me," my superior, my chief.

    Compare John 1.15 in the following versions:

    • The Geneva Bible. (1560)
      Iohn bare witnesse of him, and cryed, saying, This was he of whom I said, He that commeth after me, was before me: for he was better then I.
    • 1864 Emphatic Diaglott
      He who comes after me is in advance of me; for he is my superior

    • 1902 Joseph Bryant Rotherham's Emphasized Bible
      Joh 1:15  (John beareth witness concerning him, and hath cried aloud, saying––the same, was he that said––He who, after me, was coming, before me, hath advanced; because, my Chief, was he.)

  6. It appears that the 19th-century English translations were more accurate in bringing out the intent of John the Baptist's statement. John was saying that the one who was to follow him, is first in rank to him hence before him, because he is John's superior.
    So, while it is true that the Greek word “before” (protos) can mean “before in time,” it can just as easily be “first,” “chief,” “leader,” etc. For example, the “first” and great commandment was not the first given in time, but the first in rank. Other examples where protos (Grk for 'first') is used to mean "first in rank" are ...
    Matt 20:27 (chief), Mark 6:21 (chief), Mark 10:44 (chiefest), Luke 15:22 (best), etc.
     


    • Jesus in comparison to John was NOT "first in time," "before," BUT
      "first in importance," which will give such a meaning as "he was my Chief."
      [Cf. Leon Morris, The Gospel According to John, p108-9

  7. Concerning Hebrews Chapter 1

    In this chapter, when isolated from its context, individual phrases seem to justify Trinitarian (or even Arian i.e. pre-existent) interpretation. These phrases are: "through whom also He made the world" (v. 2); "And let all the angels of God worship him" (v. 6); "But of the Son He says, 'Your throne, O God, is forever and ever' "(v. 8); "You, Lord, in the beginning laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the works of your hands; they will perish, but you remain...You are the same, and your years will not come to an end" (v. 10, 12).
    Read in isolation — out of context — these verses may appear to say that Jesus is GOD or deity. However, we should never read back into the text what later traditions have taught us.
    The book of Hebrews was first written to encourage believers who were facing persecution to remain loyal to Christ. These believers were Jewish converts to Christ and they must be encouraged to see the superiority of Christ over the old Jewish system of things. Christ is superior to the angels (who had mediated the old covenant); he is superior to Abraham, Moses and Joshua. Christ is superior to the Levitical priesthood and Temple rituals and sacrifices. This superiority rests in the fact that Jesus is the resurrected Son of GOD, not that he is Almighty GOD or a (pre-existent) deity. Think about it!

    If Jesus is GOD in human form, then the author could have saved himself a lot of ink and time. All he needed to do was write that Jesus is superior to all because "He is GOD". End of argument.

    But the opening verses of Hebrews allow no such interpretation. They run like this: "God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world" (v. 1-3).
    Under the old covenant GOD spoke in various portions and in various ways to the fathers in the prophets. In contrast, He now speaks through a Son in these last days. One of the ways GOD spoke in OT times was also through the mediation of angels (see Heb. 2:2). This means, amongst other things, that GOD's message to Israel was not through a pre-existent Son who was an angel, as Jehovah's Witnesses believe, nor can it mean — as many Trinitarians think — that Jesus was the "angel of the LORD"; nor can it mean that GOD spoke to the fathers in OT days through a
    pre-existent Son. For the opening verses of Hebrews testify that before the birth of Jesus there was no Son of GOD as GOD's messenger to men. In the OT, GOD did not speak through the Son. For the obvious reason that the Son wasn't even conceived yet!
    Bluntly then: "What emerges from the first two verses of the book of Hebrews is that Jesus was not God's agent to Israel in Old Testament times,"
    (Buzzard and Hunting, The Doctrine of the Trinity (1998), p. 75).

    The Son — through whom GOD has in these end-times spoken — has been "appointed heir of all things" (v. 2). Then comes the statement that through this appointed heir of all things GOD "made the world" (v. 2). The old KJV translation has "through whom He made the worlds." Seeing this, we tend to immediately think of the Genesis creation at the beginning of the universe. But the word used for "worlds" here is the word for "ages" (aion) from which we get our English word eon(s). The writer is not speaking of the Genesis creation of the heavens and the earth. He is speaking about time periods, epochs. In Jewish thinking there were classically two great ages. The first is the present and evil age. [Gal 1.4] The next will be the Messianic age to come. And Hebrews 1:2 is speaking of the world — or more precisely — the Messianic age to come. He goes on to tell us that through Jesus' sacrificial death on the cross a new way has been opened up for us to enter
    the new earth and the new heavens of the future Messianic Kingdom when it dawns.
    This "appointed heir of all things" is the agent, the mediator through (Grk. dia) whom GOD has — in prospect — brought about the new Messianic age. True, this Son now "upholds all things by the word of his power" (v. 3b). But it is the new creation — the Messianic age — that is held together by his (authorized and delegated) power. In the Messianic Kingdom everything will be based on Christ's word and teaching. Without Christ and his word of the Kingdom there is no Messianic Age to uphold.
    And in that new age even the angels will worship the Son, for he has "become as much better than the angels, as he has inherited a more excellent name than they" (v. 4). This is what the Father had decreed through the prophets long ago (v. 5). If there is any doubt that Christ the Son will be worshipped in that glorious new age the author dispels such a question by promising that "when He [GOD] again
    brings the first-born into the world, He says, 'And let all the angels of GOD worship him' " (v. 6). At the Second Coming the Father's decree will become history. Every knee, whether in heaven or on earth, will pay homage to the Son (see Ps. 2:12). This worship of Jesus the Son does not make him Almighty GOD.

    Just as in the OT, the Kings of Israel and dignitaries were
    worshipped.
    There is a worship applicable to Almighty GOD alone; and there is a worship applicable to kings and dignitaries. In fact, the Hebrew word for worship, shachah in the OT, is used in reference to men more often than it is for Almighty GOD; compare also (1 Chr 29:20) And David said to all the congregation, Now bless YAHWEH your God. And all the congregation blessed YAHWEH God of their fathers, and bowed down their heads,
    and
    worshipped (shachah) YAHWEH, and the king.

    David received worship alongside GOD Almighty!! That is, David received civil/regal worship just as Christ did in the NT!

    This act of (relative) worship of Jesus by the angels will honor the Father, for it is His will they do this (Phil. 2:9-11).
    I have already commented on Psalms 45 in my first email; However, I will again quote Kuschel conc. Hebrews:

    • The phrases 'reflection of his glory' and 'stamp of his nature (1.3) represent a christological acceptance of the authority of wisdom as the bearer of divine revelation (Wisdom 7.25f.). The eschatological context and the present participles used in these statements (literally: he, being reflection and stamp) make it clear that ... something is being said about the present being and action of the exalted Christ: 'The hymn is not concerned to make either a statement about pre-existence or a statement about the earthly life of the Son, but a statement about the significance of the Son for the community in the present.'

    • The words from Ps. 2.7 and II Sam. 7.14 about the divine Sonship of Christ which are quoted in Heb. 1.5 (evidently against a speculative 'angel christology') point in the same direction. We already saw in the analysis of the sayings source that the phrase in the psalm 'You are my Son, today I have begotten you' does not indicate an eternal begetting in God before time, any more than does the saying from II Samuel, 'I will be his Father, and he will be my Son'. As is well known, Psalm 2 is a royal psalm, and Ps. 2.7 does not refer to a pre-existence of the king but to his appointment as son of God on his accession. And II Sam. 7.14 refers to the confirmation of the Davidic monarchy by Yahweh himself. So here 'begetting' is a synonym for exaltation.

    • The divine predicate given to Christ in the quotation from Ps. 45 (1.8, 'Your throne, O God, is for ever and ever') is not speculation about divine nature from pre-existence christology, but an interpretation of the statements which relate to the exalted Christ ('reflection' and 'stamp'). 'Both terms attest that in Jesus Christ God's nature and his glory can be seen.

      (Kuschel, Born Before All Time?, p. 356.)

  8. So, the Christology of Hebrews is not a pre-existence Christology but primarily a Christology of exaltation. The author is not concerned with primal time, but with the status of Christ as regent in the present which ensures our salvation. The foundations of the new Messianic age - the new heavens and the new earth - will be firmly laid on Messiah's throne (v. 10-12). The original intention of the writer of Psalms 102, is to speak about the coming Messianic age of the Kingdom which is to be centered in Jerusalem. This is a prophecy that "will be written for the generation to come; that a people yet to be created may praise YAHWEH" (Ps. 102.18). The Psalmist anticipates the day when Jerusalem will be restored under Messiah. This Messianic agent through which GOD will speak will be the one
    "to establish [literally, 'plant'] the heavens; to found the earth, and to say to Zion, You are my people' " (Is. 51.16).
    The Word Bible Commentary says of these verses:

    • This makes no sense if it refers to the original (Genesis) creation ... In other instances God acts alone using no agent (Isa. 44.24). Here the one he had hidden in his hand is his agent. Heavens and land refers metaphorically to the totality of the order in Palestine. Heaven means the broader overarching structure of the empire, while "land" is the political order in Palestine itself.

  9. Thus, the series of truths being mentioned in these verses in Hebrews 1 refer to the time when GOD re-introduces His now glorified Son, His "first-born into the world" (Heb. 1.6). If there is still any doubt that this is the correct interpretation the writer states in Heb. 2.5:
    "For He did not subject to angels the world to come, concerning which we are speaking".

    All the prophetic announcements of Hebrews 1 relate to the Messianic age to come! His concern is not with the old Genesis creation but with the new world in mind. Hebrews 1 speaks about the Son being the king of Israel, and mentions a throne, a scepter and a Kingdom with no end.
    In that Messianic age when the Son sits on the throne, he stills has One above him whom he calls his "GOD": "Therefore God, your GOD, has anointed you with the old of gladness above your companions" (Heb 1.9). One should now realize that Hebrews 1.8-10 is not saying that Jesus is Almighty GOD or any other deity. The reason is that it specifically states that the Son has a GOD who anointed him. If Jesus is Almighty GOD and has a GOD above him, then there are two Gods/deities. This is an utter impossibility to the writers of the Scriptures.

    Dear Readers, my above comments on Hebrews 1 are mostly based upon a book titled
    "They never told me this in church!", by Greg S. Deuble (p. 232-238) -
    available from http://www.abc-coggc.org/coggc/books.htm

    I thoroughly recommend this book!

  10. Concerning Hebrews 2:13-18

    Firstly, the word "nature" is not even in 2:16 ... in fact the phrase "him the nature of" & the 2nd him are not present in the verse, hence, that is why they are in italics; because these words were added by the translators, they are not based on the Greek text. The word nature is not present in the Greek text of this verse! Hence, 2:16, no doubt was translated in such a way to bring about a trinitarian, pre-existing bias as you have picked up! ... seeing that the translators were reading a "God the Son" theology into the text. Heb 2:16 could equally be translated ...

    • NKJV Hebrews 2:16 For indeed He does not give aid to angels,
      but He does give aid to the seed of Abraham.

    • New American Standard Bible Hebrews 2:16
      For assuredly
      He does not give help to angels,
      but He gives help to the descendant of Abraham.

    • RSV Hebrews 2:16 For surely it is not with angels that he is concerned
      but with the descendants of Abraham.

    • New RSV Hebrews 2:16 For it is clear that he did not come to help angels,
      but the descendants of Abraham.

    • American Standard Version Hebrews 2:16 For verily not to angels doth he give help,
      but he giveth help to the seed of Abraham.

    • New American Bible Hebrews 2:16 Surely he did not help angels
      but rather the descendants of Abraham;

    • English Standard Version Heb 2:16 For surely it is not angels that he helps,
      but he helps the offspring of Abraham.

  11. Hopefully, you get the gist of what this verse is saying ...
    It has absolutely nothing to with "nature", whether divine or otherwise!

    Verse 16 simply appears to be saying that it was 'the children of Abraham' that Christ came to help.

    Dunn concerning the writer of Hebrews states:

    • It would certainly go beyond our evidence to conclude that the author has attained to the understanding of God's Son as having had a real pre-existence. In short, a concept of pre-existent sonship, yes; but the pre-existence perhaps more of an idea and purpose in the mind of God than a personal divine being.
      (p. 55-56)

  12. The word 'also' in v. 14 is simply to strengthen the special point of the writer's emphasis of the humanity of Jesus.
    The earliest followers of Jesus indeed emphasized the humanity of Jesus.
    Concerning my thoughts on 2:13-18, I believe George Wesley Buchanan makes an excellent exegesis.
    He points out that the expression in the Greek text of v. 14 is actually "blood and flesh":

    • 2.14.
      The expression "flesh and blood" is a customary Jewish and Christian idiom meaning human nature, especially as distinct from divine nature (Matt 16:17; I Cor 15:50; Gal 1:16; Eph 6:12; Nazir 9:5; Sotah 8:1). ... The idiom used by the author of Hebrews, however, was "blood and flesh." This was the blood and flesh which Jesus shared equally with the children, and may not have referred specifically to human nature at all. The expression may have taken human nature for granted, but meant to specify that among the human beings that existed on earth, Jesus was of the same "blood and flesh" as other children of Abraham; they were all fellow Israelites and belonged to the same family tree (see Deut 17:15).

    • 2:16: For he certainly does not prefer [take] angels but he prefers [takes] the seed of Abraham.

      The word translated "prefer" (epilambanetai) means to seize, lay hold of, attack, come up to, reach, or obtain. It is a slight variant from anti-lambanetai, with the same meanings essentially, in the following LXX quotation

      • 8 "But you, Israel, my son Jacob, whom I chose (exelexamen—Hebrew behartika). [the] seed of Abraham, whom I loved
        9
         whom I took (antelabomen — Hebrew hehezaqtika, "laid hold of")
        from the boundaries of the earth . . ." (Isa 41:8-9).

    • The author must have had a LXX text which had some variants. He shows no sign of wanting to vary the meaning from its Old Testament context. As he used the compound word "take," he meant, as did the LXX translator by his form of the compound, to "take" by choosing, to take one thing in preference to another. The angels have not been mentioned since [Heb. 2] vs. 9, but they continue to be involved in the comparison with the Son. Here, however, the claim is made that Jesus was not only greater than the angels, but that the Israelites were also given preference over angels. Paul was also of the same opinion. He claimed that the saints were destined to judge angels (I Cor 6:3). In the Isaiah passage, the subject was God who did the choosing, loving, and taking. As before, the author changed the subject to Jesus who chose (took) the seed of Abraham rather than angels, but the object remains the same. It is Israel, Jacob, or the children of Abraham who were the chosen, the brothers, and the sons of whom the Son was not ashamed. ... The author of Hebrews held that Jesus and the sons of Abraham were "all from one" (2:11) father, namely Abraham. He shared equally with the children of Israel in blood and flesh; he belonged to the same basic ancestry. This strongly suggests that the author of Hebrews and the community for whom he prepared this document were all members of some branch of
      Jewish Christianity.

      TO THE HEBREWS, G.W. Buchanan, (1985), p. 34, 35-36

  13. So, in conclusion then, the writers of John's Gospel and the book of Hebrews, do not contradict the Gospels of Matthew & Luke, who clearly have no knowledge of a pre-existent Jesus, of a Messiah who personally pre-existed his own conception. More and more Biblical scholars are coming to the realization of this fact.
    They see no personal pre-existence in the Gospel of John nor in the book of Hebrews.
    For example:

    • Professor C.B. Caird of Oxford University wrote, "The Jews had believed only in the preexistence of a personification. Wisdom was a personification, either of a divine attribute, or of a divine purpose, but never a person. Neither the fourth Gospel nor Hebrews speaks of the eternal Word or Wisdom of God in terms which compel us to regard it as a person."
      (The Development of the Doctrine of Christ in the New Testament, p. 79)

  14. Matthew speaks of the genesis [beginning] of Jesus Christ [Matt. 1.18]. Jesus began just like every human being (except of course Adam & Eve) in the womb of their mother. Granted, Jesus' genesis/beginning was like no other, nevertheless, he began in the womb of his mother.
    John, like the writer of Hebrews, views a pre-existence of the plan of GOD concerning His Son.
    Jesus' pre-existence is a notional pre-existence. He pre-existed as an idea in the plan of GOD. GOD foreordained him. And in the fulness of time, that plan was executed, that idea was made flesh resulting in the conception of Jesus the Messiah.
    Almighty GOD had him in mind when He created all things, when He created the ages; especially the age to come, the new heavens & the new earth; in which Jesus will rule as Lord of all, to the glory of GOD the Father.

FINIS

Dear Readers,
May GOD continue to bless you in the knowledge of God,
and of Jesus our Lord,

Amen

Powered By Blogger